Hampshire 1
Snows Group Hampshire 1 | |
---|---|
Current season or competition:![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sport | Rugby union |
Number of teams | 10 |
Country | ![]() |
Holders | Millbrook (1st title) (2015–16) (promoted to London 3 South West) |
Most titles | United Services Portsmouth, Trojans, Andover (2 titles) |
Website | englandrugby.com |
Snows Group Hampshire 1, also known as Hampshire 1, is an English level 9 Rugby Union League. For the 2014-2015 season it is made up of 11 teams from Hampshire. The eleven teams play home and away matches from September through to April.
Promoted teams move up to London 3 South West and relegated teams drop down to Hampshire 2. The points system is as follows.
- 4 points awarded for a win.
- 2 points awarded for a draw.
- 0 points awarded for a loss.
- 1 "bonus" (+) point awarded for scoring 4 tries (or more).
- 1 "bonus" (+) point awarded for losing by 7 points (or fewer).
No team can get more than 5 points in a match. Points awarded are the same regardless of outcome at home or away. The new point system has been in effect since 2010-11 season.
Contents
- 1 Teams and results for 2015-16
- 2 Teams and Results for 2014-2015
- 3 Teams and Results for 2013-2014
- 4 Teams and Results for 2012-13
- 5 Teams and Results for 2011-12
- 6 Teams and Results for 2010-11
- 7 Teams and Results for 2009-10
- 8 Teams and Results for 2008-09
- 9 Hampshire 1 Honours
- 10 References
- 11 See also
Teams and results for 2015-16
Position | Team | Games | Won | Drew | Lost | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Millbrook | 20 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 89 |
2 | Bognor | 20 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 88 |
3 | Fareham Heathens | 20 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 78 |
4 | Fordlingbridge | 20 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 55 |
5 | Sandown & Shanklin | 20 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 54 |
6 | Chineham | 20 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 52 |
7 | Farnborough | 20 | 7 | 1 | 12 | 38 |
8 | Isle of Wight | 20 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 32 |
9 | Petersfield | 20 | 5 | 1 | 14 | 26 |
10 | Ellingham & Ringwood | 20 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 22 |
11 | Locksheath Pumas | 20 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 3 |
- Chineham (promoted from Hampshire 2)
- Ellingham & Ringwood (relegated from London 3 South West)
- Locksheath Pumas (promoted from Hampshire 2)
- Sandown & Shanklin (relegated from London 3 South West)
Teams and Results for 2014-2015
Position | Team | Games | Won | Drew | Lost | For | Against | Difference | + Points | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | United Services, Portsmouth | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 807 | 266 | 541 | 18 | 90 |
2 | Millbrook | 18 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 557 | 277 | 280 | 14 | 76 |
3 | Bognor | 18 | 13 | 0 | 5 | 523 | 334 | 189 | 13 | 65 |
4 | Fordingbridge | 18 | 12 | 0 | 6 | 627 | 404 | 223 | 14 | 62 |
5 | Fareham Heathens | 18 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 418 | 332 | 86 | 10 | 54 |
6 | Petersfield | 18 | 6 | 0 | 12 | 394 | 505 | -111 | 11 | 35 |
7 | Isle of Wight | 18 | 5 | 0 | 13 | 323 | 653 | -330 | 4 | 24 |
8 | Farnborough | 18 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 331 | 479 | -148 | 9 | 20 |
9 | Romsey | 18 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 273 | 604 | -331 | 4 | 20 |
10 | Alton | 18 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 232 | 631 | -399 | 6 | 9 |
Fareham and Petersfield promoted into Hampshire 1 at the start of the season from Hampshire 2.
Teams and Results for 2013-2014
Position | Team | Games | Won | Drew | Lost | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Andover | 22 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 93 |
2 | Fordingbridge | 22 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 93 |
3 | Millbrook | 22 | 17 | 0 | 5 | 86 |
4 | United Services, Portsmouth | 22 | 15 | 0 | 7 | 76 |
5 | Solent Uni | 22 | 15 | 0 | 7 | 70 |
6 | Farnborough | 22 | 13 | 0 | 9 | 65 |
7 | Bognor | 22 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 56 |
8 | Romsey | 22 | 6 | 0 | 16 | 34 |
9 | Isle of Wight | 22 | 6 | 0 | 16 | 33 |
10 | Alton | 22 | 6 | 0 | 16 | 30 |
11 | Southampton | 22 | 5 | 0 | 17 | 25 |
12 | Overton | 22 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 9 |
Solent Uni promoted into Hampshire 1 at the start of the season from Hampshire 2.
Andover promoted to London South West 3 at the end of the season.
Southampton and Overton demoted to Hampshire 2 at the end of the season.
Teams and Results for 2012-13
Position | Team | Games | Won | Drew | Lost | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New Milton & District | 22 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 98 |
2 | Fordingbridge | 22 | 17 | 0 | 5 | 85 |
3 | Alton | 22 | 17 | 0 | 5 | 82 |
4 | Millbrook | 22 | 14 | 0 | 8 | 71 |
5 | United Services, Portsmouth | 22 | 12 | 1 | 9 | 63 |
6 | Andover | 22 | 13 | 0 | 9 | 62 |
7 | Farnborough | 22 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 54 |
8 | Romsey | 22 | 8 | 1 | 13 | 44 |
9 | Isle of Wight | 22 | 8 | 0 | 14 | 42 |
10 | Southampton | 22 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 30 |
11 | Petersfield | 22 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 18 |
12 | Aldershot & Fleet | 22 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 17 |
Southampton promoted into Hampshire 1 at the start of the season from Hampshire 2.
New Milton & District promoted to London 3 South West at the end of the season.
Aldershot & Fleet and Petersfield demoted to Hampshire 2 at the end of the season.
Teams and Results for 2011-12
Position | Team | Games | Won | Drew | Lost | + Points | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Eastleigh | 22 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 100 |
2 | Fordingbridge | 22 | 18 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 88 |
3 | United Services, Portsmouth | 22 | 16 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 81 |
4 | Millbrook | 22 | 17 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 80 |
5 | New Milton & District | 22 | 13 | 0 | 9 | 16 | 68 |
6 | Isle of Wight | 22 | 13 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 63 |
7 | Petersfield | 22 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 9 | 57 |
8 | Romsey | 22 | 8 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 39 |
9 | Farnborough | 22 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 18 | 38 |
10 | Ventnor | 22 | 5 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 22 |
11 | Lytchett Minster | 22 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 9 |
12 | Southsea Nomads | 22 | 2 | 0 | 18 | -1 | 7 |
Southsea Nomads promoted into Hampshire 1 at the start of the season from Hampshire 2.
Lytchett Minster transferred to Dorset and Wilts Regional Leagues at the end of the season.
Eastleigh promoted to London 3 South West at the end of the season.
Southsea Nomads and Ventnor demoted to Hampshire 2 at the end of the season.
Teams and Results for 2010-11
Position | Team | Games | Won | Drew | Lost | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Andover | 20 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 86 |
2 | Eastleigh | 20 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 75 |
3 | Millbrook | 20 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 66 |
4 | New Milton & District | 20 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 60 |
5 | Farnborough | 20 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 52 |
6 | United Services, Portsmouth | 20 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 48 |
7 | Romsey | 20 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 41 |
8 | Ventnor | 20 | 6 | 1 | 13 | 34 |
9 | Isle of Wight | 20 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 32 |
10 | Southampton | 20 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 28 |
11 | Fareham Heathens | 20 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 12 |
Andover promoted to London 3 South West at the end of the season.
Fareham Heathens and Southampton demoted to Hampshire 2 at the end of the season.
Teams and Results for 2009-10
Position | Team | Games | Won | Drew | Lost | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alton | 20 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 38 |
2 | Petersfield | 19 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 32 |
3 | Eastleigh | 20 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 30 |
4 | Millbrook | 20 | 11 | 1 | 8 | 23 |
5 | Romsey | 20 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 22 |
6 | Southampton | 20 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 |
7 | New Milton & District | 20 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 14 |
8 | United Services, Portsmouth | 20 | 6 | 1 | 13 | 13 |
9 | Farnborough | 20 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 12 |
10 | Fareham Heathens | 20 | 5 | 1 | 14 | 11 |
11 | Aldershot & Fleet | 19 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 3 |
Alton promoted to London 3 South West at the end of the season.
Aldershot & Fleet demoted to Hampshire 2 at the end of the season.
Teams and Results for 2008-09
Position | Team | Games | Won | Drew | Lost | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fordingbridge | 18 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 29 |
2 | Sandown & Shanklin | 18 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 26 |
3 | United Services, Portsmouth | 18 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 24 |
4 | Farnborough | 18 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 22 |
5 | Alton | 18 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 17 |
6 | Romsey | 18 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 13 |
7 | New Milton & District | 18 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
8 | Eastleigh | 18 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 11 |
9 | Southampton | 18 | 5 | 0 | 13 | 10 |
10 | East Dorset | 18 | 6 | 0 | 11 | 8 |
Hampshire 1 Honours
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />
, or <references group="..." />
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />
, or <references group="..." />
See also
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[dead link]
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Cite error: <ref>
tags exist for a group named "n", but no corresponding <references group="n"/>
tag was found, or a closing </ref>
is missing